Pet cafe howling

THE owners of Pet Lover’s Cafe in Maylands have seen business plummet drastically following an online campaign accusing them of supporting puppy mills—all because they bought a dog from an eastern states breeder.

The family-owned business collects money for pet charities and says it supports abolishing puppy mills. It has rescued and fostered many animals and hosts adoption nights where rescue animals can meet potential new owners in the shop’s backyard, away from the stressful shelter environment.

But buying a schnauser from an eastern states breeder—who they say they thoroughly vetted—was enough to earn the ire of online animal activists who say they should’ve rescued a dog instead.

Cafe owner Natalie Goodall says her six-year-old daughter was dead-set on a schnauser, a rare breed with hypoallergenic fur. They kept an eye on rescue lists for a more than a year but there are long waiting lists for the bearded cuties and they get snapped up quickly.

They eventually turned to an eastern states breeder to find a pooch, satisfied it was a legitimate operation.

After a hardcore group of activists found out, the shop’s online presence was flooded with negative reviews (there was previously only a single one-star rating with text attached, from 180-odd reviews). “If you say you support rescue, then you should put your money where your mouth is. Disgusting!” Fremantle’s Kerryn Wood wrote alongside a one-star review.

01. 881NEWS
• Helen Walsh, Pet Lover’s Cafe owner Natalie Goodall, Luke Harries and Ollie—business has been hit by a well-meaning but thoughtless online campaign claiming they support puppy farms, when they don’t. Photo by Matthew Dwyer

“There is a reason why rescue’s exist,” (sic), Samatha Pekaar said. “Puppy mills/backyard breeding. Finding out that you support such a things is utterly disgusting” (sic).

Tia Mia Angelus, Debbie Stafford, Steffy Forrester, Tracey Elizabeth Hall and Laura Nash posted similar allegations.

A “puppy mill” is a breeder who keeps dogs in cruddy conditions, churning out puppies for profit with no regard for the dogs’ welfare. This week Labor proposed legislation to outlaw them in WA.

Ms Goodall says she’s dead against those kind of operations, and she was satisfied the breeder was humane after doing research and talking to a client who’d adopted from the same place.

The Voice contacted the negative reviewers, asking them why they believed the business supported puppy mills.

Ms Pekaar replied, saying the breeder wasn’t registered to breed schnoodles: “They did purchase a cross breed… registered breeders do not breed crossbreeds, they breed pure breeds. Registered breeders are those who have to adhere to various guidelines enforced by Dogz Online,” a pure breed dog community.

But in fact, the family had originally been offered a cross-breedy schnoodle but ended up going with a schnauser (which the breeder is registered for).

We asked Ms Pekaar if she had evidence the breeder was inhumane, but did not hear back.

None of the other posters responded to our enquiries.

Business at Pet Lover’s Cafe has plunged by half since the campaign started about three weeks back, and when the Voice visited on a Tuesday morning in prime latte hour the place was empty. Baked treats sat untouched and the coffee machine, which usually pumps out special lactose-free lattes, sat silent.

Ms Goodall says she’s not sure what to do.

“We can’t stay in the business with it being this low for much longer,” she says. “We just really need the community support, for people to shop local and support small business. We need people to turn up, have that coffee and book that training session.

“We’re transparent about what we do. We’re a family business who have nothing to hide.”

by DAVID BELL

1. 881 Inglewood Amcal 10x2.3

Posted in

18 responses to “Pet cafe howling”

  1. Steffy Forrester Avatar
    Steffy Forrester

    I know that I wasn’t contacted for a quote but my name is mentioned.
    These people bought a puppy from the Trading Post online for Pete’s sake. After having been informed about puppy farms. This is not about breeder vs. rescue. This about unregistered breeders selling cross breeds on the Internet. You should have contacted http://www.oscarslaw.org for contact. We are not ‘hardcore activists’ we are everyday people who want to see the end of the cruel puppy trade. Business owners in the pet industry should know better.

  2. Tracey Avatar
    Tracey

    David Bell please explain your statement in this story saying “none of the other posters responded to our enquiries” because you most certainly did not attempt to contact me.

    1. Simon Avatar
      Simon

      I note there is no response to him not contacting you in this week’s issue.

  3. Shane Avatar
    Shane

    Actually the reason business is low is because the owners are pretty impersonable. We usually goto Dome in Maylands and the staff there are lovely but at the Pet Lovers Cafe we generally get treated with some neglect. Stop looking to blame other things and have a look at the service you’re providing.

  4. Jeremy Avatar
    Jeremy

    Rescuing pets doesn’t balance out the act of buying a pet from a breeder – which keeps them breeding more animals…

    1. ab Avatar
      ab

      So buying a dog from a breeder is a no-no? Gosh there are just so many rules these days, trying to keep up with “do-gooders” latest rules is a full time job!

    2. kexkez Avatar

      Steffy : ” there are labradoodle breeders here. At least 2 of them registered with their association”. I’m not sure what is vague about this. “Their” in this statement was being used as a pronoun to replace the word Labradoodles, as in a labradoodle association. Since the article is about the cafe owners I saw no reason to have to be that specific and give complete details of this association. It is not relevant and I’m not commenting to plug a breed pure or otherwise. Did you read my full comment. I even used the word ” cross” in part of my post in reference to cross breed dogs coming from rescue centres.

    3. kexkez Avatar

      Jeremy so you’d rather they risk the health of their family member and collect a rescue dog, contaminating their home with anything the rescue dog brings from contact with other dogs at the rescue ( hair, saliva, urine etc) as well as whatever the dog has from itself? Just on the off chance the family member doesn’t had an allergic reaction to the dog? Or you don’t care that of there is an issue the poor dog has to be unsettled again and rehomed or returned to the rescue organisation and the family traumatised because of having to give up a wanted pet? And/or because of a family members health. You are willing to put someone health at risk on the off chance the dog won’t make them sick?or are you trying to say because they have a family member with a health risk allergy they aren’t allowed a dog if they can’t take a rescue?

  5. Samantha Avatar
    Samantha

    Dear David

    I am writing in response to your recent article ‘Pet Café Howling’ dated 14 May 2015 so that a few facts can be clarified and corrected.

    I read with interest that your article stated that an online campaign accusing the Pet Lovers Café in Maylands of supporting puppy mills created a drastic plummet in their business.

    I have attached a screen shot of the so called ‘breeders’ page showing where and what the owners of the Pet Lovers Café were purchasing. Clearly it shows that they were not in fact purchasing a recognised breed, instead they were purchasing what is commonly referred to as a ‘designer dog’. A mixed breed dog to be correct, a Schnoodle. Mixed breed dogs, regardless of the fancy titles and names ‘breeders’ give them are not recognised by the Australian National Kennel Council Ltd, and are against the councils National Code of Ethics of Responsible Dog Ownership (point 15). You will also note that Schnoodles are not included in the councils listing of registered breeds. It is also interesting to note that since the ‘online campaign’ (to quote your article), the owners of the café have now decided to change their initial decision to purchase a Schnoodle, and now purchase a recognised breed. Presumably damage control.

    Due to recent publicity from various sources including MP’s and Animals Australia, the general public is becoming much more aware of puppy mills, puppy farms and back yard breeders. All of which are unregulated, and all of which contribute to the oversupply of unwanted animals which already choke the pound system and rescue groups across Australia. Not to mention the tragic and despicable conditions these dogs are kept in where they are literally ‘bred to death’ and pass on many congenital diseases to their offspring due to the lack of health testing of the breeding dogs. Please take a moment of your time to inform yourself of the horrors of this trade – Animals Australia has some very informative information including videos that would hopefully make you think twice about being seen to support this trade. There are several other informative sources of information including http://www.rspca.org.au/campaigns/puppy-farms, http://www.oscarslaw.org, http://www.greens.org.au/initiatives/vic/abolish-puppy-farms.

    Your article also touched on how the dog was for the café owners daughter. Very disappointing to see a child indulged with a puppy of a particular type from a Back Yard Breeder. It is far better to educate the current generation that dogs requiring adoption from pounds, shelters/rescues or other ethical sources are just as worthy as the designer mixed breeds from an unregistered breeder “Back Yard Breeder” or a local petshop.

    To those involved in animal rescue/welfare, the practice they work so hard towards abolishing has been disregarded by someone within the animal industry. One would assume previous interaction and prior support of animal rescues would have guided a more informed, and thus better decision.

    Furthermore, I would like to add that I did respond to you, the writer of the article several times with questions about the intent of the article etc, however in the article it was stated that I had not responded at all. In fact, in conversation with me on 12th of May, you stated “But is backyard breeding necessarily cruel?”, which suggests that you, as the writer of the article, lack the understanding and education to be accurately reporting on such a topic.

    It should also be noted, that others quoted within the article as posting on the cafes Facebook page were in fact not contacted for comment. They were forfeited the right of response.

    I thereby request a formal apology and retraction of incorrect facts to be posted in the paper, with all quoted parties contacted advising this will occur. I would also request a follow up article to provide the correct information on choosing a new pet, focusing on ethical and responsible sources.

    I can be contacted for comment on this email address.

    Regards

    Samantha Pekaar

  6. jane Avatar
    jane

    How about you try being a professional journalist. This article is trying to do nothing more than name and shame people who have put reviews online. Perhaps you should try doing either some thorough investigation (instead of mud slinging) or writing a plain old advertorial.

  7. Julie armstrong Avatar
    Julie armstrong

    Discussing who are these people that try to undermine people’s livelihood by getting on the bandwagon. My god you can’t do anything nowadays without upsetting someone I have a busy weekend coming up but I will go out of my way to call in for a cuppa and cake !!!

    1. Steffy Forrester Avatar
      Steffy Forrester

      What bandwagon? The owners ordered a designer mini teacup puppy off the Trading Post! Working in the pet industry they should know better.
      Yes you’d better go and buy a coffee. IF this business is failing it’s because people like you don’t go there, not because of a couple of puppy farm activists.

  8. kerry Avatar
    kerry

    A shame they found no schnauser breeder here with dogs available when they were looking. They can be very difficult to find available. We had no luck when we were looking either. There are labradoodle breeders here. At least 2 of them registered with their association. Of course they are not a “pure” breeder either but the ones who are part of the association do hip, dna and other health checks for genetic problems and take back any dogs people choose not to keep so they wont end up in rescue centres as well as sterilizing any not deemed good enough health wise and before selling as pets. . You cant take a “cross” from a rescue centre and be sure it will be hypo. we tried but couldn’t tell ourselves when we were looking for one. Contamination from other dogs means you can’t tell if you are allergic to them if you visit a centre. Any pups may be non shed and then start to shed when they get their adult coat. I feel sorry for them. I promote rescue animals as much as I can. I don’t have a rescue dog. i do have a rescue cat.

    1. Steffy Forrester Avatar
      Steffy Forrester

      Registered with what association? That’s a bit vague. They sure as hell aren’t registered with Dogs West because a ‘labradoodle’ or any other kind of oodle, doodle or schnoodle is not a breed it’s a cross!

      1. kexkezKexkez Avatar

        Steffy, Registered with the labradoodle association——> ” with their association.” I did not imply labradoodle were a non cross. Dogs west only register non crosses, although technically every dog breed was one once.

      2. kexkez Avatar

        Steffy : ” there are labradoodle breeders here. At least 2 of them registered with their association”. I’m not sure what is vague about this. “Their” in this statement was being used as a pronoun to replace the word Labradoodles, as in a labradoodle association. Since the article is about the cafe owners I saw no reason to have to be that specific and give complete details of this association. It is not relevant and I’m not commenting to plug a breed pure or otherwise. Did you read my full comment. I even used the word ” cross” in part of my post in reference to cross breed dogs coming from rescue centres.

  9. Steffy Forrester Avatar
    Steffy Forrester

    I would also like to point out that purchasing a puppy from a breeder, registered or otherwise is not ‘adopting’ as quoted in this article!

  10. Noelle Revera Avatar

    So, Samantha, you seem to be under the illusion that registered breeders are responsible, good people who care about what they breed. Putting all the other stuff to one side, these people are actually responsible for the mess that is breeding, or most of them are. It may go back many generations, but eventually you will get to the start-up point – and that gorgeous Great Dane in the pound fits somewhere there.

    I’ve been in dog rescue for over 30 years and have had several rescue dogs in that time – so I’m no amateur mucking about amid strays and “surrenders” to rescue groups and pounds. It’s a hellish job, and some people are basically psychotic, so it’s not something filled with gorgeous, caring people.

Leave a comment