Minister steps in on Ruah decision

Ruah needs to move the drop-in centre currently at this Shenton Street site so this seven-storey women and children’s centre can be built.

LABOR’S state planning minister Rita Saffioti will intervene in Perth council’s decision to reject a Northbridge homeless drop-in centre’s relocation to James Street.

At its May meeting Perth council rejected homeless service provider Ruah’s plan to move the Shenton Street centre a 270m walk away, so it could build a seven-storey women and children’s refuge on the site.

The move required the council to approve a “change of use” to turn the James Street building into a “community or cultural centre”, but it was rejected on the basis of threats to amenity and safety outlined by many objections from concerned locals who’d be the centre’s new neighbours.

Ruah appealed the decision to the State Administrative Tribunal but a day before the case’s preliminary hearing Ms Saffioti announced she would exercise her ministerial power to “call in” the matter and decide on the change of use herself.

Ms Saffioti told parliament on June 23: “Ruah has also written to me asking that I, as Minister for Planning, call in the application and that I determine that application for the change of use. I want to report today that I have agreed to determine the change of use application for that centre.”

The minister can only step in on SAT appeals if an application deals with issues of state or regional importance, and isn’t restricted to making decisions based on planning policy but can also consider the public interest. 

Ms Saffioti said: “We know that the issues surrounding homelessness are difficult, and they are difficult to manage throughout the community.

“However, it is important that we stay strong and make decisions that benefit the entire community, and in particular those who are at risk and who need the services. 


“Without this decision, and without this process, not only would the drop-in centre for the homeless be impacted, but also the application and proposal to build a seven-storey new dedicated facility for family and domestic violence. 

“It is important that the overall package from the state government be considered from a strategic point of view.”

Submissions to Ms Saffioti are open to July 6.

At the June 28 Perth council meeting deputy lord mayor Di Bain said: “The City has engaged a specialist planning lawyer to assist with our submission”. It will also be forwarding more than 100 opposing statements from locals who originally objected to the move, and inviting them to make new submissions. 

Whatever her decision Ms Saffioti must provide reasons to the City of Perth and both houses of Parliament. 

If Ms Saffioti reverses the council’s decision it’ll be the second time they’ve been overruled over Ruah’s plans. 

In April, Ruah’s application to build the seven-storey women and children’s shelter that’ll be replacing the drop-in centre went to the joint development assessment panel. The project’s cost was stated as $15m so it’s exactly at the threshold where the state government rules deem the matter too significant to be decided by the council alone. 

The two councillors on the joint panel, Liam Gobbert and Catherine Lezer, voted against it after hearing residents’ concerns but they were overruled by the three panel members appointed by the state government.


2 responses to “Minister steps in on Ruah decision

  1. Typical of Saffioti and her gang of three JDAP acolytes. Why is it that it’s always her gang of three against a councils two. Exactly the same when the vote was taken regarding the Karrinyup Shopping Centre tower blocks which all the surrounding community opposed. This is not democracy. This is dictatorship at it’s worst and people of the State must close it down. The acolytes are appointed by her and obviously do as they are told irrespective how good and logical the communities opposing presentation is. It is simply unfair and wrong that government can ride slipshod over communities in this way.

  2. When did community centres become state or regional issues?
    By definition they are for the benefit of those who live or work in the locality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s